006: Unaware
3 responses to “006: Unaware”
-
The intro vignette was very effective, celebrating both helplessness and opportunity. The “this is Fantasy” disclaimers were appropriate and not unnecessarily labored. Somehow I had never really appreciated the “just a peek, she won’t even know” aspect of Unaware before, so now I’m ruminating on that. It occurs to me that the casual and effortless way an unaware Biggo can cause death and mayhem often requires that some innocent tiny suffer an absurd or pointless death in order to heighten the risk experienced by the protagonist/observer, including to show just how strong their desire to explore a Biggo’s body justifies that risk. Where is meaningful consent in any of that?
-
I think that question answers itself: if the observer is stimulated by observing the involuntary manslaughter of a tiny person by the means of a giant person’s incidental movements, consent is obviated, and they’re not looking for consent in the material they consume. Some people need consent to be present in their Size Erotica, and some people don’t require or want it to be a factor at all. The Tiny doesn’t have to consent to be smothered in an armpit any more than you or I have to consent to a grand piano falling upon our heads: it’s going to happen, and some people are turned on by that inexorable demonstration. Hell, they may even be aroused by the lack of consent, by a big sexual Fate befalling someone in heedless violation of their plans for the day.
-
-
Ok. Now I am VERY curious about the tecnique used by Jamie McCartney to make those lead crystal models. I mean, the external is easy: a negative silicone cast on which a positive model is made in what I believe to be plaster. Nothing too complicated. But for the interior… After all, it should always be a negative cast to then make a positive model out of the final model. But I just can’t imagine what substance he used that wouldn’t injure the inside of the vagina or otherwise maintain the shape of a cavity that is still subject to elasticity, movement, contractions etc. My artisanal soul is burning by curiosity.
This podcast rose so many topic I’d like to talk about: but I fear there is no space for everything, so I chose two in particular.
I am pretty familiar with the fantasy of body exploration. I love all the parts of a woman’s body and every detail, everything that can enlight my senses is more than welcom. I am not so familiar with the fantasy of Unaware… at least not in the context of body exploration, because I always fantasized about scurring in an ambient without being seen by an eventual woman.
The concept of body exploration (or its darker aspects) combined with unawareness raises a question for me. Is there a correlation between this kind of fantasy, in this kind of context, and the dimensions imagined by the user of this fantasy?This could be the usual Size Nerd crazy wondering of mine… I realize that other people probably do not have fantasies so close to reality as to wonder about it, but to get to touch, to take advantage of the body of a person unaware of our presence, there is no question that the smaller or tinier one is, the less chance there is of being felt by the giant/giantess’s sense of touch.
So, I wonder: since there are great variations, in the community, in one’s preferred size, do the users of this fantasy desire for themselves the smallest sizes in the community (from 1 inch and down to microscopic size)? Or are the size and the unaware fantasy (in the context of body exploring/sex/rape/direct contact with the subject) not directly related?
The other point concerns the psychological and cultural aspect of “wanting to take a peek”.
As you rightly pointed out there is a cultural-historical peculiarity among Protestant branch societies (tending to be Germanic and English/American) that makes the human body and its knowledge and exploration a real taboo. And as we all know, taboo breeds desire and fantasy. A demonstration of this is the fact that in the Italian community, which I know best, or in any case neo-Latin unaware is slightly less popular because of the less intensity of body taboo that can be found, for example, in the U.S.
But it is also true that I recognize a component of the unaware fantasy-or at any rate of “wanting to take a peek”-that is common somewhat in all societies. That of the first approach to desired sex. After all, it is that same sense of the forbidden, without being discovered, that many of us had when we had our first pornographic experiences in our hands. Whether it was lingerie catalogs, some TV shows or the Internet – depending on the generation – that danger of being discovered by one’s parents/family members/authority figures in general added that adrenaline rush that, it is known, can be a powerful aphrodisiac. Isn’t it?
zHEIGHTgeist 
Leave a comment